Pilot teams with changing warehouse workflows
You want to see whether one platform can switch between handling, picking and transport without major changes to your existing warehouse, which is designed for people.
A humanoid robot may be worth considering for a warehouse pilot if you want one platform to handle several different handling or picking tasks in an environment designed for people. If the priority is repeatable material transport with clearly defined handovers, businesses should also compare specialist autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and other automation against the same tasks. Fraunhofer IML describes humanoid logistics robotics as a technology at an early stage of development. Before deploying it alongside employees, you’ll need to assess integration and safety for the specific warehouse area.
You want to see whether one platform can switch between handling, picking and transport without major changes to your existing warehouse, which is designed for people.
You’re comparing humanoid robotics with AMRs and other specialist automation because repeatable movements of materials are central to the tasks you have in mind.
Before a mobile system is used alongside employees in the warehouse, you need to assess its operating area, interfaces, foreseeable disruptions and safeguards.
Your task list will determine which technologies to compare in a pilot. An integration partner can then help you assess the chosen solution within your specific warehouse process.
Consider it if: You want to trial several different handling and picking steps in the same environment, which is designed for people.
Weigh up: Potential flexibility is no substitute for evidence that the platform can handle your specific tasks. Fraunhofer IML emphasises that the technology is still at an early stage of development.
Consider them if: Repeatable material transport and fixed handovers are the priority, rather than changing picking and gripping tasks.
Weigh up: A specialist transport solution won’t automatically handle the manipulation tasks that could be central to a humanoid pilot.
| Criterion | What to check before buying | Who should pay particular attention |
|---|---|---|
| Changing tasks | Ask for the planned sequence of gripping, picking and handovers to be demonstrated using the exact model and a suitable gripper. | If different orders come through the warehouse, I want to know whether the same platform can handle the workflows I have in mind. Around 33% of buyers put this flexibility first. |
| Safe integration | Start the risk assessment before selecting and purchasing equipment. Define routes, interventions and safe shutdown procedures for the specific area. | Where employees and robots share an area, I need a robust safety plan in place before the pilot. Safe integration is the top priority for around 27% of buyers. |
| Standardised transport | Separate transport missions from gripping tasks, and compare loads, handover points and traffic conditions for both solutions. | If the main task is moving containers or trolleys between fixed points, I need a transport process I can clearly assess. Around 20% of buyers prioritise this flow of materials. |
| Operational availability | Test the charging or battery-swap plan, as well as fault handling and restart procedures, within the planned shift pattern. | A pilot is only useful to me if charging breaks and blockages can be managed during operations. Operational availability comes first for around 20% of buyers. |
A humanoid platform may be at its best when switching between tasks. That alone isn’t a reason to choose one for a mostly repetitive transport mission.
Break down the target process into transport, gripping, picking and exceptions. Compare the solutions against the same list of missions and acceptance criteria.
Under section 3 of the German Ordinance on Industrial Safety and Health, CE marking does not replace a risk assessment for the specific workplace use.
Start the assessment before selecting and purchasing equipment, involving the people responsible for workplace safety, integration and warehouse operations.
If necessary safeguards are identified late, changes to the area and repeat assessments could delay the pilot.
A planned workflow doesn’t tell you how the system will be safely paused and restarted if it needs charging, becomes blocked or loses communication.
Include charging or battery-swap times, status messages, manual interventions and safe restart procedures in your pilot tests.
Charging points take up space, while faults and safe interventions can reduce the proportion of time the system is available for use.
A single pilot won’t show how a model performs with different loads, routes, interfaces or faults. Fraunhofer IML also describes the market as young and diverse.
Ask for demonstrations using the containers and tasks you have in mind, and set criteria for completed missions, required interventions, shutdown and restart procedures.
NEURA Robotics describes 4NE1 as a humanoid platform and reports on a pilot using EWM to support picking at BITZER’s warehouse.
Apptronik positions Apollo for material handling and changing workflows in existing warehouse environments.
Agility Robotics reports that its humanoid platform Digit is being used to move containers at GXO.
Mobile Industrial Robots offers AMRs as a specialist alternative for internal transport and material handling.
No. Under section 3 of the German Ordinance on Industrial Safety and Health, CE marking does not replace a workplace risk assessment. This must also take account of the warehouse area concerned, work equipment and the safeguards required.
Under section 3 of the German Ordinance on Industrial Safety and Health, it should begin before you select and purchase the work equipment. Take the intended use, workflows and work organisation into account.
If the safety of the work equipment depends on how it is assembled or installed, section 14 of the German Ordinance on Industrial Safety and Health requires it to be inspected by a competent person before it is used for the first time. This includes checking that it functions safely and that its safeguards are effective.
For a pilot in Germany in October 2026, the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC remains relevant. According to the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 will generally apply from 20 January 2027. Check with the manufacturer and integrator which conformity documents are required for the machine’s specific status and integration.
Ask for the manufacturer’s information and instructions needed for your risk assessment, along with the conformity documents relevant to the machine’s specific status. Also document the safety, integration, charging and fault-handling plans for the proposed setup, and confirm whether an inspection under section 14 of the German Ordinance on Industrial Safety and Health is required.